When scientists deceive: applying the federal regulations
| Title | When scientists deceive: applying the federal regulations |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2009 |
| Authors | O'Neil, C. C., & F. G. Miller |
| Journal | J Law Med Ethics |
| Volume | 37 |
| Pagination | 344-50 |
| ISBN Number | 1748-720X (Electronic)1073-1105 (Linking) |
| Accession Number | 19493078 |
| Keywords | Deception Ethics Committees, Research Government Regulation Guideline Adherence Human Experimentation/ ethics Humans Informed Consent/ethics/ standards United StatesHuman Experimentation Human Experimentation |
| Abstract | Deception is a useful methodological device for studying attitudes and behavior, but deceptive studies fail to fulfill the informed consent requirements in the U.S. federal regulations. This means that before they can be approved by Institutional Review Boards, they must satisfy the four regulatory conditions for a waiver or alteration of these requirements. To illustrate our interpretation, we apply the conditions to a recent study that used deception to show that subjects judged the same wine as more enjoyable when they believed it had a higher price. |
| Notes | O'Neil, Collin CMiller, Franklin GUnited StatesThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & EthicsJ Law Med Ethics. 2009 Summer;37(2):344-50. |
| Citation Key | 271 |



